Manual QA first β€’ Clear bug reports β€’ Automation on request

Manual QA Testing for Web & Mobile Apps

Catch issues before your users do. I provide hands-on manual testing focused on real user behavior, broken flows, UI inconsistencies, usability gaps, and release readiness.

The main focus is practical manual QA. For teams that need more, I can also support test automation with Playwright, Selenium, and JavaScript for repeated checks and long-term project maintenance.

24–48h first feedback
Manual-first real user perspective
Flexible hourly or ongoing support

Why Manual Testing Still Matters

Automated tests are valuable for repeated checks, but they do not replace human observation. Manual QA remains essential for real user journeys, fast-changing interfaces, exploratory coverage, and product-level feedback that scripts often miss.

🧠

Human Judgment

Manual testing helps uncover weak UX decisions, unclear behavior, validation gaps, and product risks that are hard to anticipate in automation scripts.

🚢

Real User Flows

Testing is performed the way users actually move through the product, not only through ideal or predefined scenarios.

⚑

Fast for Changing Products

Manual QA is especially effective for MVPs, startup products, active UI changes, pre-release checks, and evolving requirements.

Manual QA Services

Practical testing support for web and mobile products, with a strong focus on manual quality assurance.

βœ…

Functional Testing

Verification of features, expected behavior, business logic, and critical product flows.

πŸ”Ž

Exploratory Testing

Flexible, experience-based testing designed to uncover hidden defects, weak points, and risky edge cases.

πŸ”

Regression Testing

Manual retesting of key flows before release to confirm that recent changes did not break existing functionality.

🎯

UI / UX Testing

Detection of layout issues, visual inconsistencies, confusing interactions, and friction in the user experience.

πŸ”Œ

Basic API Checks

Request and response validation, authentication checks, and coverage of important API behavior.

πŸ—‚οΈ

Test Cases & Checklists

Structured scenarios and reusable QA notes for repeatable testing and better test coverage.

How the QA Process Works

Step-by-step
  1. You share the build, scope, platforms, browsers, and priorities.
  2. I review the product and define the most useful testing approach.
  3. I test critical flows manually and document issues clearly.
  4. You receive bug reports with reproduction steps, evidence, and practical priorities.
  5. Fixes can be retested if needed.
Typical Deliverables
  • Clear bug reports with reproduction steps
  • Expected vs actual results
  • Severity or priority suggestions
  • Screenshots and screen recordings
  • Test notes, checklists, or test cases

Automation Support with Playwright, Selenium & JavaScript

Manual QA is the core service, but automation can be added when it creates real value. This is especially useful for repeated regression checks, stable user flows, smoke tests, and projects that need ongoing QA maintenance.

🎭

Playwright Automation

Support for modern browser automation using Playwright and JavaScript, suitable for UI flows, smoke tests, regression coverage, and cross-browser checks.

πŸ•ΈοΈ

Selenium Testing

Automation support for web testing with Selenium where existing project setups, legacy suites, or long-standing browser workflows already rely on it.

πŸ’»

JavaScript-Based QA Support

Practical automation work using JavaScript for maintainable checks, simple test scripts, repeated validations, and long-term QA project support.

Best use cases for automation
  • Repeated regression testing for stable flows
  • Login, signup, checkout, booking, and dashboard smoke tests
  • Release confidence checks before deployment
  • Reducing manual effort on repetitive tasks
  • Supporting long-term projects with reusable test coverage
Balanced approach

The goal is not automation for the sake of automation. The goal is product quality. Manual testing stays central for user experience and exploratory coverage, while Playwright, Selenium, and JavaScript can support the areas that benefit from repeatable checks.

Manual-first QA Playwright Selenium JavaScript Regression Support

Hourly Pricing

Flexible hourly rates based on scope, complexity, timelines, and project needs.

Quick Manual Review

entry

from €10 / hour

  • Exploratory manual testing
  • Basic bug reporting
  • Single platform focus

Release Readiness Check

popular

from €15 / hour

  • Functional + regression testing
  • Detailed bug reports with evidence
  • Retest support

Ongoing QA Support

custom

By agreement

  • Long-term QA collaboration
  • Weekly or sprint-based support
  • Manual QA with optional automation

*Final rate depends on project complexity, release urgency, platforms, and required coverage.

Request QA Support

Tell me about your product, timeline, and the areas you want tested.

What to include
  • Test environment link and access details if needed
  • Platforms: Web, iOS, Android, and target browsers
  • Critical flows such as signup, checkout, booking, payments, or admin actions
  • Release timeline and business-critical priorities
  • Whether you also need automation support with Playwright, Selenium, or JavaScript
Best fit for
  • Pre-release checks
  • MVP and startup testing
  • Manual regression before deployment
  • Projects that need human-centered QA feedback
  • Teams looking for optional QA automation support
Availability

Monday–Friday: 09:00–18:00 (Europe/Sofia)